CO129-163 - Sir Kennedy - 1873 [4-6] — Page 370

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

Page 366

Passengers Act 1855, and Ordinance No 8 of 1871 when leaving this Port for Saigon,

I have the honor to report that it is because the voyage between touching and arriving at Saigon is not of seven days' duration that, as regards the passage, the Steamers are not subject to the laws which I have quoted above.

2.

This is, I apprehend, quite manifest from the proviso to Section 2 of Ordinance No. 8 of 1871, which declares that nothing in that Ordinance shall be deemed to affect Chinese Passenger Ships which shall clear out and proceed to sea merely upon a voyage of not more than seven days' duration within the meaning of the Chinese Passengers Act 1855 and certain local enactments.

That proviso I find "inserted for the purpose of obviating any doubts which might arise in the minds of Shipmasters as to whether the exception in the Ordinance of 1871 corresponds with the exception in the Imperial Act of voyages not exceeding seven days duration". The law is, therefore, I presume, perfectly clear that Saigon is not declared to be a Port more than seven days distant.

Edit History

2026-05-21 03:10:17 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
Page 366 Passengers Act 1855, and Ordinance No 8 of 1871 when leaving this Port for Saigon, I have the honor to report that it is because the voyage between touching and arriving at Saigon is not of seven days' duration that, as regards the passage, the Steamers are not subject to the laws which I have quoted above. 2. This is, I apprehend, quite manifest from the proviso to Section 2 of Ordinance No. 8 of 1871, which declares that nothing in that Ordinance shall be deemed to affect Chinese Passenger Ships which shall clear out and proceed to sea merely upon a voyage of not more than seven days' duration within the meaning of the Chinese Passengers Act 1855 and certain local enactments. That proviso I find "inserted for the purpose of obviating any doubts which might arise in the minds of Shipmasters as to whether the exception in the Ordinance of 1871 corresponds with the exception in the Imperial Act of voyages not exceeding seven days duration". The law is, therefore, I presume, perfectly clear that Saigon is not declared to be a Port more than seven days distant.
Baseline (Original)
366 Passengers Act 1855, and Ordinance No 8 of 1871 when leaving this Port for Saigon, I have the honor to report that it is because the between toughing and Journey Saigon to are of not days' duration that, Rever regards ibat vajage, than the Steamers are not subject to the laws I which I have quoted above. 2. This is, I apprehend, quite manifed from the praise to Section DI of Ordinance No. 8 of 1871, which declares that nothing in that Ordinance shall be deemed to affect Chinese Pa Pafosugar Ships which shall clear int and pro See Altomey Gommal. Refert Ordinance to sea h Mere upar a verjage of than Rever not Days' duration within the meaning of the Chinose Passengers Act 1880 and certain, local enaciments. That proviso ANNO I find. " inserted for the purpose of obviating arise in God if any doubts which might my the minds of Shipmasters as to whether the exeception of 1871 excception in the Imperial Act of Vegages not I "exeeceding + teraino in seven. days duration fme." The law is, therefore, I presume, pafietty clear that Saigon is not declared long A to be a Part of more than R N Leven
2026-05-21 03:10:17 · Baseline
View content

366

Passengers Act 1855, and Ordinance No 8 of 1871 when leaving this Port for Saigon,

I have the honor

to report that it is because the

between toughing and

Journey

Saigon

to are

of

not

days' duration that,

Rever

regards

ibat

vajage,

than

the Steamers

are not subject to the laws I

which I have quoted above.

2.

This is, I apprehend, quite

manifed from the praise to

Section DI

of Ordinance No. 8 of 1871, which declares that nothing in

that Ordinance shall be deemed

to affect

Chinese Pa

Pafosugar Ships

which shall clear int and pro

See Altomey

Gommal. Refert

Ordinance

to sea

h

Mere

upar a verjage of

than

Rever

not

Days' duration

within the meaning of the

Chinose Passengers Act 1880 and

certain, local enaciments.

That

proviso

ANNO

I find.

"

inserted for the purpose of obviating

arise in

God if any doubts which might my the minds of Shipmasters as to

whether the exeception

of 1871

excception in the Imperial Act of Vegages not I "exeeceding

+

teraino in

seven.

days duration

fme." The law is, therefore, I

presume, pafietty clear that

Saigon is not declared

long

A

to be a Part of more than

R N

Leven

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.